Diagnosis and Management Considerations in Acute and Maintenance Treatment of Schizophrenia
Prognosis and Treatment
September 29, 2006 | Peter F. Buckley, MD |
Dr. Buckley is Professor and Chair of Psychiatry, Medical College of Georgia
Antipsychotic
medications are the mainstay of treatment for schizophrenia. A host of new,
second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs, Table 1) have increasingly replaced
first-generation medications, largely because of lower risk of inducing motor
side effects. These newer drugs are not without their own side effects,
however. Most notably they are associated with a heightened risk of weight gain
and metabolic disturbances-including diabetes.
The CATIE Study and Beyond
In an effort to evaluate
the relative merits of current medications, the National Institute of Mental
Health commissioned the largest ever treatment study in schizophrenia, the
CATIE study.5-7 The study had three phases (Figure 1), with patients
being able to receive care for up to 18 months in this carefully conducted
study. The results provide some guidance as to how each different drug will fit
within the therapeutic armamentarium. For a summary of the results of Phases I
and II of the CATIE study, see the Appendix.
The CATIE study does
not address directly the tremendous amount of polypharmacy in clinical
practice. Important areas to be further studied include effective augmentation
strategies, duration, and sequence of treatment choices at various stages of
the illness.8 For instance, the presentation of the first episode of
psychosis is perplexing and highly stressful for patients and families alike.
Here, the clinician is faced with several options on how to initiate treatment
in a first-episode patient. However, this same variety brings doubts on which
medication to start in a first-episode patient. In addition, there is
particular interest in trying to identify and treat patients in the prodromal
phase, before florid psychosis emerges. This approach is still in its infancy
and in the research arena, although preliminary studies are showing promise.9
Additionally, there are
indications from pharmacogenetic studies that efficacy for the domains of
symptoms and reduced re-hospitalization may be predicted through genetic
analysis. Moreover, there is also evidence that the side-effect profiles of
SGAs and their propensity to cause weight gain, glucose and lipid abnormalities
may be predicted by pharmacogenetic analysis in this patient population.10
This is an encouraging approach, particularly if improved “patient-to-drug”
matching results in better treatment compliance overall.11
Goals of Acute and
Maintenance Treatment
Patients may require
hospitalization for injurious behavior, deterioration in symptoms, and/or
bizzare behavior. Several SGAs are available in different formulations (oral
tablet, dissolvable waifer, liquid, or intramuscular) which helps with choice
of medication toward the clinical scenario. The goal of acute care is
stabilization and treatment planing so that there will be a successful
transition to maintenance treatment.
The goals of long-term
treatment are to maintain stabilization, prevent relapse, improve functional
performance, and promote recovery. While medications are the bedrock of
maintenance treatment, people need a host of other supports and services.
Continuous antipsychotic therapy is recommended, although in practice there is
a lot of switching of medications (as exemplified by the results of the CATIE
study) and this is also often interrupted by either partial or complete
medication noncompliance.
Improving Patient Outcomes
Compliance is complex
issue,12 involving illness-related factors, person (attitudinal)
related factors, and more general (health system) factors (Table 3). Achieving
optimum mediation compliance is important in schizophrenia, where failure to
take antipsychotics has been repeatedly shown to be associated with an
overwhelmingly higher risk of hospitalization. In addressing this need, there
are now several novel approaches (using web-based, hand-held, and related
technologies) to improving medication compliance.13 Less technical
approaches such as skills training or cognitive-behavioral therapy (so-called
“compliance therapy”) have also shown to be effective interventions to enhance
medication compliance in patients with schizophrenia.14
The combination of new medications
and effective rehabilitative and cognitive remediation interventions has the
potential to improve patient outcomes significantly beyond what was expected
previously. Patients with persistent symptoms and impairments in social
competence can show benefit from social skills training. Importantly, supported
employment programs show potential toward increasing the ability of patients
with schizophrenia to obtain competitive employment. The use of computer-based
cognitive remediation strategies for schizophrenia is also gaining ground.
Family members are
strong advocates to positively impact the outcomes of schizophrenia and in
planning for healthcare services. With the goal of promoting integrated and
more effective mental health care, family members have joined together with
other organizations to find more inclusive policy and practice approaches
toward reducing the stigma against schizophrenia.
Additionally, patients
who are recovering from mental illness disease are playing an ever-increasing
role in public health policy and patient care in schizophrenia. The recovery
philosophy which recognizes the unique contributions of those who have
experienced mental illness is now a guiding approach for systems transformation
and—in particular with the emergence of Peer Support Specialists—a
fundamental direction for mental health care delivery in many states.15
Recovery is an unprecedented, concerted effort to change public opinion and to
achieve integration and superior services at all levels for persons with mental
illness. Although still at a nascent stage that is awaiting more widespread
acceptance by clinicians, the introduction of Peer Support Services represent
an innovation in mental health care.
Appendix. CATIE: Summary of Findings
Phase 1: Discontinuation and Adverse Effects
Discontinuation
- 74% all cause discontinuation at 18 months (median 6 months)
- Olanzapine 64%, risperidone 74%, perphenazine 75%,
ziprasidone 79%, quetiapine 82%
- Time to all-cause discontinuation was longer for olanzapine than quetiapine or risperidone
- Time
to discontinuation due to efficacy was longer for olanzapine than perphenazine, quetiapine, or risperidone
- Similar
time to discontinuation due to intolerability of medications
- Similar time to discontinuation due to patient choice
Adverse effects
- Less hospitalization on olanzapine
- Least discontinuation due to side effects on risperidone,
10%
- Most discontinuation due to side effects on olanzapine, 18%
- Most weight gain on olanzapine,
30% (of patients), on average 2 lbs per month
- Most metabolic (lipids, cholesterol) changes on olanzapine
- Ziprasidone was the only drug
with reductions in metabolic parameters
- Most prolactin elevation on risperidone
- Similar rates of discontinuation across drugs due
to extrapyramidal adverse effects
- Similar profiles on cardiovascular parameters
Phase 2: Efficacy Pathway and Tolerability Pathway
Efficacy Pathway
- Most eligible patients chose the tolerability pathway
- All cause discontinuation rate was
68.9%
- All cause discontinuation rates by drug-Clozapine 56%, Olanzapine 71%, risperidone 86%, quetiapine
93%
- Lack of efficacy and patient choice the main reasons for stopping treatment
- Less discontinuation
on clozapine and patients on average lasted 10.5 months
- Similar time to discontinuation due to intolerability of
medications
Tolerability Pathway
- All cause discontinuation rate was 73.6%
- Lack of efficacy and patient choice the main reasons
for stopping treatment
- Patients on average lasted longer on olanzapine (6.3 months) or risperidone (7 months) than
on ziprasidone (4 months) or quetiapine (2.8 months)
- More weight gain and metabolic disturbance on olanzapine
- More elevated prolactin on risperidone
- Patients on ziprasidone lost weight
To take the free, online CME post-test, go to www.mssmtv.org/psychweekly.
References
1. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association;
1994.
2. Harvey PD, Green MF, Keefe RSE, Velligan D. Cognitive function in schizophrenia: Its role in the definition and evaluation
of effective treatments for the illness. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65:361-372.
3. Saykin AJ, Shtasel DL, Gur RE, et al. Neuropsychological deficits in neuroleptic naive patients with first- episode
schizophrenia. Arch
Gen Psychiatry. 1994;51:124-131.
4. Robinson DG, Woerner MG, McMenamin M, et al. Symptomatic and functional improvement from a first episode of schizophrenia
or schizoaffective disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:473-479.
5. O’Tuathaig CMP, Babovic D, O’Meara G, et al. Susceptibility genes for schizophrenia:
characterization of mutant mouse models at the level of phenotypic behavior. Neurosci Behav Rev. 2006. In press.
6. Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, et al. Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. N
Engl J Med. 2005:353:1209-1223.
7. Stroup TS, Lieberman JA, McEvoy JP, et al for the CATIE investigators. Effectiveness of olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone,
and ziprasidone in patients with chronic schizophrenia following discontinuation of a previous atypical antipsychotic. Am
J Psychiatry. 2006;163:611-622.
8. McEvoy JP, Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, et al for the CATIE investigators. Effectiveness of clozapine versus olanzapine,
quetiapine, and risperidone in patients with chronic schizophrenia who did not respond to prior atypical antipsychotic
treatment. Am
J Psychiatry. 2006;163:600-610.
9. Buckley PF. So which drug do I choose next? Curr Psychiatry. 2006. In press.
10. Narasimhan M, Buckley PF. Early interventions when symptoms suggest a psychotic prodrome: implications from research
to clinical practice. Curr Psychiatry. 2005;4:32-46.
11. Miller DD, Ellingrod VL, Holman TL, Buckley PF, Arndt SV. Weight gain associated with the -759 C/T polymorphism of
the 5HT2C receptor and clozapine. Am J Med Genet. 2005;133B(1):97-100.
12. Hwang R, Shinkai T, Deluca V, et al, Dopamine D2 receptor gene variants and quantitative measures of positive and
negative symptom response following clozapine treatment. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006;16:248-259.
13. Ascher-Svanum, Faries DE, Zhu B, et al. Medication adherence and long-term functional outcomes in schizophrenia in
usual care. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67:453-460.
14. Velligan DI, Lam YW, Glahn DC, et al. Defining and assessing adherence to oral antipsychotics: a review of the literature. Schizophr
Bull. 2006. In press.
15. Turkington D, Kingdon D, Weiden PJ. Cognitive behavior therapy for schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:365-373.
16. Liberman, R, Kopelowicz A. Recovery from schizophrenia: a concept in search of research. Psychiatr Serv. 2005;56:735-742.
To take the free, online CME post-test, go to www.mssmtv.org/psychweekly.
Back to Page 2, Diagnosis and Etiology